Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Effective Attention-Getters


Different kinds of attention-getters:
-personal anecdotes
-fact (shocking, impactful)
-imagery/painting a picture

Examples of GOOD attention-getters:

Yesterday while walking in my neighborhood, I passed a girl half my height. Both this
observation as well as her girlish pigtails and youthful expression led me to the assumption that she attended the elementary school across the street. After she passed me, I turned around to notice the word “JUICY” plastered across the top of her pants in bright pink letters. This strange juxtaposition of youth and flirtatiousness, of girlish immaturity and sexuality is a primary concern Huxley explores in his dystopian novel Brave New World.

Reasons why this is good:
-connects to our lives
-really grabs the attention because it makes a connection back to them, intrigues them to continue reading

You are told what wear: a grey tunic, the dress of all of your peers. You are told what to do:
you will sweep streets rather than being a scientist as you desire. You are told who to talk to:
you must not interact with anyone of the opposite sex nor develop intimate relationships with
friends or family. This is the reality of the dystopian universe Rand captures in Anthem.


Reasons why this is good:
-instructs the reader in what to do
-sets up the scene in the story really well
Not-so-good (bad) example:
During the year of 1941, very few flowers grew in Lorain, Ohio. The characters of The Bluest Eye by Toni Morrison, black girls in their early adolescence, also have trouble growing and flowering into confident, happy young women.

Reasons why this is not a good one:
-not shocking
-does not engage the reader

  

Friday, October 1, 2010

Concluding The Crucible

I'm dissapointed I didn't leave more time for us to discuss The Crucible's ending.  I love it and am always sad it's over.  I thought we brought up some great points today about the appendix, today's judicial system, Proctor's confession, Miller's use of the word "cannot", the motif of names, Giles's death, and many others.  Here are some questions I was thinking about as I listened and pondered today...

Why did the play end by focusing on Proctor and Elizabeth and completely leave out, for example, any mention of Abigail and the girls, our other prominent characters in the text?

I love Melaine's question about departures from reality, and am particularly wondering about that in relation to that "echoes down the corridor" snippet following Act IV.  I'm excited to do some more researching about this idea.  One particular facet that stuck out to me is the detail Miller references as to Elizabeth's future marriage.  I can't decide if/ how this changes my thinking about her.

I was also thinking about the idea of heroism and who the hero of The Crucible is, if it has a hero at all.  I've been talking about this a lot with one of my other classes so it's been on my mind...

Thoughts about these questions?  What thinking did our discussion and the end of the play inspire for you?